Pharmacognostical Standardization of Sida acuta Leaves (Malvaceae Family)
S. Selvadurai1*, K. Thirumalai1, S. Anbazhagan2, P. Shanmugapandiyan3
1Department of Pharmacognosy, Surya School of Pharmacy, Vikravandi, Villupuram, Tamil Nadu, India.
2Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Surya School of Pharmacy, Vikravandi, Villupuram, Tamil Nadu, India.
3Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, School of Pharmacy, Satyabama Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
*Corresponding Author E-mail: sselvadurai14@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
Sidaacuta burm.f.is an endemic and an important medicinal plant species of south India. Despite having immense medicinal importance, few information is available on the standardization parameters of the species. For this reason, present work was carried out for providing comprehensive report on the quality control and standardization parameters of Sidaacuta burm. f. In this connection leaves of the plant were examined. Methods like microscopy and macroscopy, physicochemical parameters, extractive values and fluorescence analysis were used to establish pharmacognostical standards. The macroscopic, microscopy and physicochemical parameters of leaves of Sidaacuta burm. f. revealed various diagnostic characteristic in the species. This is the first study providing complete pharmacognostic profile of Sidaacuta burm. f. and hence will be useful for correct identification and authentication of the species for future studies.
KEYWORDS: Sidaacuta, Microscopy, Macroscopy, Physicochemical parameters, Extractive values and fluorescence.
1. INTRODUCTION:
Plants happen to be serving human beings as a natural source of cure for various ailments and diseases since ages. The world has seen huge increase in plant research in recent times, and numerous evidences show vast potential of medicinal plants used in various traditional systems1. The beneficial role of plant or plant-derived products in human therapy is a significant breakthrough in the history of humankind. However, it is not easy to know the accurate number of medicinal plants available on earth till date2. The World Health Organization estimates that 80% of the world's population relies on herbal medicine.
Meanwhile, the use of herbs in the United States is expanding rapidly, to the point where herbal products are readily found in most pharmacies and supermarkets.
From 1990 to 1997, as the use of complementary and alternative medicine rose from 34 to 42%, herbal use quadrupled from 3 to 12%3. Three technologies namely Biotechnology, Herbal technology and information technology (Bioinformatics) are going to be the most powerful elements that are crucial t for the welfare and prosperity for the people of nations4.
Shrubby and heavily branched, with thin, terete branches that are minutely stellately haired. Petioles 0-6mm long, shorter than the serrate, glabrous on both sides; Petioles 0.5 to 1.8, either shorter or longer than the petiole, in each axil, united about the middle. Leaves 2.5-6.3cm long, lanceolate, with rounded base strongly serrated, and glabrous on both sides. Longer than 6 to 8mm; triangular, sharp lobes. Yellow corolla that is almost twice as long as the calyx. Fruit is 5-6mm in diameter; there are 2 awns that are nearly linear and about 1/3 the length of the carpel. Carpels are 5–9, glabrous but not pubescent, strongly reticulate, and toothed on the dorsal borders. Black, silky seed. To speed up suppuration, heated leaves that have been moistened with a little gingivitis oil are used. In Bengal, the expressed Leaf juice is employed in treat intestinal worms in the form of an electuary. The herb is advised for the therapy for snake and scorpion bites when used in conjunction with other medications5.
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Plant materials:
Sidaacuta Burm. f fresh's leaves was identified and collected in Tamil Nadu's Thothukudi district's Komaneri village. And three leaves are authenticated by Dr. Sunilkumar K.N Department Head and Research Officer SCRI (Siddha Central Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu. 160-S01022003A are the authentication certificate number. The leaves of all three plants were removed from their branches in the shade, then let to dry. The leaves were powdered after being crushed. (sieve no. 10/44) and stored in airtight containers with adequate labels.
Instrumentation and techniques:
Macroscopy:
Fresh and healthy leaves of Sidaacuta burm. f. were assessed for their external characteristics.
Microscopy:
Leaf specimens were cut into rectangular pieces that included the midrib and a portion of the lamina. For paradermal sections, specimens measuring 0.05cm2 were cut out from the midrib portion of the lamina. The leaf specimens were fixed and embedded in paraffin blocks6 followed by dehydration, infiltration and sectioning7 and finally staining and photographing of the sections8. Photography was done by using a Nikon labphot 2 microscope unit. Descriptive features were matched with those included in standard anatomical books9,10. Air-dried leaves were powdered using a homogenizer and the leaf powder was considered as drug. The total ash, water soluble ash and acid insoluble ash content was determined by employing standard methods of analysis as described11 in the Indian Pharmacopoeia (1966). Quantitative determination of the powdered drug like physicochemical constants12 were carried out.
Powder microscopy:
For the analysis of plant powder, pinch of fine powder is taken in a test tube and boiled in chloral hydrate solution for few minutes. A few drops of powder were smeared on a slide mounted with phloroglucinol followed by few drops of concentrated HCl14. The prepared slides were then observed under a microscope and photographed.
Physicochemical parameters:
Various physicochemical parameters (foreign matter, moisture content, ash value, fat content, pH, swelling index, foaming index, fluorescent analysis, extractive value) were analyzed.14–18
3. RESULTS:
Macroscopy
Stipules have an unequal size of 5 to 8 x 1 to 1.5 mm, one lanceolate and one linear, a petiole that is up to 4 mm long. Simple, alternating, whole, oblong to lanceolate, whole towards base, serrate at base, apex acute to acuminate, sparsely hirsute to glabrate on both surfaces, and three-nerved at base are the characteristics of the leaves13 (Figure 1).
Fig – 1 Sidaacuta burm.f.
Microscopy:
Petiole's transverse section:
The contour of the TS (Transervers section) of the petiole is round and wavy. The epidermis has many stellate trichomes that cover the whole surface of the petiole. Following the epidermis is a layer of chlorenchymatous hypodermis, which leads to the cortex. Three to four a number of collenchyma tissues and five to six a number of thin-walled parenchyma cells make up the cortex. It's also possible to visualise the distribution of rosette crystals over the cortex. The massive conjoint collateral vascular bundle in the inner cortical area is covered by a thick pericyclic layer. The rosette crystals in phloem are made up of a collection of thin-walled cells. Xylem vessels make up the tissue. parenchyma, and xylem fibres. The core area is inhabited by primary pith, which is made up of a few parenchyma cells (Figure 2).
|
|
|
|
TS of petiole |
Lower region enlarged |
Upper region enlarged |
Vascular region and Pith |
Figure 2.SidaacutaTransverse Section of petiole
Transverse Section of lamina through midrib:
Dorsi-ventral amphistomatic leaf with wavy top and lower epidermis in transverse section. Double-layered palisade cells follow the top epidermis, while the lower epidermis is followed by spongy parenchyma cells. The upper epidermis produces stellate and glandular trichomes, whereas the lower epidermis produces a greater number of covering and glandular trichomes. In the midrib region, there are 1-2 layers of collenchyma cells, followed by 3-4 layers of thin walled parenchyma cells. The midrib ground tissue contains a small number of rosette crystals. Conjoint collateral vascular bundle with xylem enclosed by phloem occupies the midrib's centre. Rosette crystals can be seen in phloem. The vascular bundle is covered by a discontinuous layer of pericyclic sheath (Figure 3).
Quantitative Microscopy:
In the table below, the quantitative information gathered during the microscopy of leaf epidermal peelings was noted. Anisocytic stomata were seen on both sides of the leaf, along with a large number of stellate trichomes and mucilage cells (Table 1, Figure 4).
Powder microscopy:
Upper and lower epidermis fragments with stomata, glandular and stellate trichomes; thick walled fibre with broad lumen and xylem vessels were found in the powder microscopic study of Sidaacuta leaves. The powder was pale green in colour, slightly bitter with mucilaginous taste with no characteristic odour (Figure 5).
Table 1. quantitative microscopy of Sidaacuta burm. f.
Parameters |
Upper epidermis |
Lower epidermis |
Epidermal number |
560-600 |
590-640 |
Stomatal number |
260-290 |
310-330 |
Stomatal index |
31-32 |
34 |
Palisade ratio |
7-10 |
|
Vein islets |
60-65 |
|
Vein termination |
90-100 |
Physicochemical parameters:
The results attained from various physicochemical parameters in different parts of A. cachemirica are presented in Table 2.
Table 2.physicochemical Results of leaves of Sidaacutaburm.f.
S.NO |
Parameters |
Results |
1. |
Moisture Content (%w/w) |
7.785 |
2. |
Extractive value (%w/w) Water Soluble Alcohol Soluble |
21.12 11.6 |
3. |
Ash values(%W/W) Total Ash Value Acid insoluble ash Water soluble ash Sulphated ash |
3.5 1.0 2.0 0.92 |
4. |
Crude fibre content (%w/w) |
12.43 |
5. |
Loss on drying (%w/w) |
0.93 |
|
|
|
TS of Lamina through Midrib |
Upper midrib region |
Lower midrib region |
|
|
|
Midrib enlarged view |
Lower portion of Midrib |
TS of Lamina |
Figure 3. Sidaacuta Transverse Section of lamina through midrib
|
|
|
|
|
Vein Islets and Vein Terminations |
Upper epidermis |
Lower epidermis |
Stellate trichome |
Mucilage |
Figure 4.Sidaacutaquantitative microscopy of leaf
|
|
|
|
Upper epidermis in surface |
Lower epidermis in surface |
Epidermis surface view in midrib |
|
|
|
||
Epidermis surface view from petiole |
Thick walled fibre and xylem vessel |
||
Figure 5. Sidaacuta Powder Microscopy of leaf
4. CONCLUSION:
The study may possibly provide a foundation for further undertakings towards generating understanding about medicinal plants of South India. The pharmacognostic studies are the first step towards ascertaining the identity and the degree of purity of herbal materials. The pharmacognostic analysis is not reported previously in this plant species thus making this first report which provides inclusive pharmacognostic profile of Sidaacuta burm. f. and thereby will be helpful for correct identification and authentication of the species for future studies.
5. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:
The author sincerely thanks Director and HOD of Pharmacognosy, Siddha central Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu and Principal, Surya School of Pharmacy, Vikravandi, Tamil Nadu for proving the necessary facilities to carry out the study.
6. COMPETING INTERESTS
The author declare no conflict of interest.
7. REFERENCE:
1. Neelofar Majid, Saduf Nissar, Weekar Younus Raja, Irshad A. Nawchoo and Zulfikar Ali Bhat. Pharmacognostic standardization of Aralia cachemirica: a comparative study. Future Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2021; 7:33 https://doi.org/10.1186/s43094-021-00181-y.
2. Gagan Shah and Uttam Singh Baghel, Pharmacognostic Standardization of the leaf of Melaleucaalternifolia (Maiden & Betche) Cheel. Afr J Tradit Complement Altern Med. 2017; 14 (3): 1-11. doi:10.21010/ajtcam.v14i3
3. Gagan Shah, Amit Chawla, Uttam Singh Baghel, Sandeep Rahar, Prabh Simran Singh, Ravi Kumar Dhawan, Pharmacognostic standardization of leaves of Melaleucaleucadendron. Pharmacognosy Journal. 2013; 5(4):143-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phcgj.2013.07.008.
4. Chukwube VO, Ezugwu CO, Odoh UE, Inya-Agha SI and Ugwuja CO, Pharmacognostic standardization of the leaf of Fadogiacienkowskii Shein fam. Rubiaceae. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 2018; 7(6): 1971-1975.
5. Krithikar, K.R., Basu, B.D., 2012., Indian Medicinal Plants, Periodical Expert Book Agency, New Delhi, pp. 2529
6. Johanson. Plant Microtechnique. New York: McGraw Hill Book Co; 1940. p. 323.
7. Sass JR. Elements of Botenical Microtechnique. New York: McGraw Hill Book Co; 1940. p. 275.
8. O'brien TP, Feder N, Mc Cull ME. Protoplasma. 1964;59:364–73.
9. Easu K. Anatomy of Seed Plants. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1979. p. 550.
10. Fahn A. Plant Antomy. Oxford, England: Pergamous Press; 1974. p. 611.
11. The Indian Pharmacopoeia. New Delhi: Govt. of India Publication; 1996. Anonymous.
12. Corner EJH. The Seeds of Dicotyledons. London: Cambridge University Press; 1976.
13. Krithikar, K.R., Basu, B.D., 2012., Indian Medicinal Plants, Periodical Expert Book Agency, New Delhi, pp. 2529
14. Anonymous (1996) Indian Pharmacopeia. Government of India 2, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Controller of Publications, New Delhi
15. Mukherjee PK (2002) Quality control of herbal drugs. Business Horizons, New Delhi.
16. Anonymous (1987) Standardization of single Unani Medicine, part-I, II. Central Council for Research in Unani Medicine (CCRUM), New Delhi
17. Chase CR, Pratt R (1949) Fluorescence of powdered vegetable drugs with particular reference to development of a system of identification. J Am Pharm Assoc. 38(6): 324 –331
18. Kokoski CJ, Kokoski RJ, Slama FJ (1958) Fluorescence of powdered vegetable drugs under ultraviolet radiation. J Am Pharm Assoc. 47(10): 715 –717.
Received on 01.06.2023 Modified on 13.10.2023
Accepted on 23.12.2023 ©A&V Publications All right reserved
Res. J. Pharmacognosy and Phytochem. 2024; 16(1):1-4.
DOI: 10.52711/0975-4385.2024.00001